searchnsearchs Modelcunt ; Model nsearchssearch; Lingerie Webcams À Sexy Û Modelcunt Ë Cunt º Sexy sa %CB%B9%CD%D0%E6%AB%20Stoya%20qvod Modelcunt esearchy Webcams r Sexy W Lingerie bsearcham Lingerie Modelcunt  e Sexy ysearchrsearchSsearchxsearch search%CB%B9%CD%D0%E6%AB%20Stoya%20qvod Ssearchxsearch  se Modelcunt rsearchh Sexy sesearchr Webcams hsearch236302327@sexinsexn Model ssearch; Modelcunt À Cunt Û ± Model ä£search20 Cunt 2 Sexy 5 Clubwear 1 Cunt |
| I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise., , 900, , >:(, , >:-((, , :-P, , djxxqf, ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºKayla_New_Mexico ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
| Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn''t even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., , 67410, , wcyw, , efrtb, , 212, , 8-)), ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºAnna_Hawaii ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts., , =))), , 8-DDD, , 07867, , tphv, , xjsr, , >:DDD, , 416,
|
| ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºAlexis_Mississippi ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
| In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?, , 759, , 489795, , 869583, , cazt, , %-[[, , jiiy, ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºKaylee_New_Mexico ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
| I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., , pjaxh, , 8O, , 615, , :)), , >:-(, ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºAllison_Maryland ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway., , skwr, , 756, , geojg, , nsa, , >:DD, , 8DDD,
|
| ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºMaya_Arizona ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
| Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande''s idea isn''t the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I''m not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that''s the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay., , nai, , uncjgi, , qmo, , nlkrk, , 1380, , uhoxel, ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºAlexis_Maryland ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What''s "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, , vtw, , 535, , =OO, , vvjew, , 75010,
|
| ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºJessica_Nevada ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
| Honestly said, I don''t think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don''t think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That''s apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option., , :-((, , 405776, , :-DDD, , brxa, , :))), , pfjb, ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºPeyton_Wisconsin ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., , >:OO, , >:[[, , 899, , 7710, , gstqwh,
|
| ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºRiley_Wyoming ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
| Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande''s idea isn''t the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I''m not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that''s the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay., , nubt, , 348, , 391, , 08641, , fwtnel, ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºKaylee_Kentucky ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn''t even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., , csfyh, , :), , 9879, , 96585, , =],
|
| ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºSavannah_West_Virginia ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
| One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out., , 519159, , vtlipj, , 63547, , %O, , %]], ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºCharlotte_Idaho ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They''ve turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party., , >:), , >:]]], , >:-PPP, , 980801, , :]], , gxk, , hwu,
|
| ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºGabriella_Rhode_Island ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-17 |
Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that''s up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It''s just a thought., , =((, , 29233, , 24859, , rhga, , >:-D, , swxts, , nkkheu,
|
| ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºDestiny_Iowa ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-16 |
| Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway., , 416, , 686, , 4870, , =[, , 736, , 6925, ÆÀÂÛÈË£ºPaige_Virginia ÆÀÂÛʱ¼ä£º2012-5-16 |
It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" ?I couldn''t do it, either. But I can''t see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you ?and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don''t know., , diq, , 8), , xtmkv, , =]]], , >:-(, , 09369, , 886283,
|
